Fix: Repair the specific failure
Keep WordPress and repair the specific failure when the foundation is sound.
If plugins, updates, performance problems, or security upkeep are consuming too much time, we’ll determine whether your WordPress site should be repaired or rebuilt on a modern stack.
Keep WordPress and repair the specific failure when the foundation is sound.
Reduce the theme and plugin burden, improve the editing workflow, or separate WordPress from the public site.
Rebuild the public experience when maintenance, performance, or architecture has become the recurring problem.
Marketing sites, publications, directories, portfolios, and service-business websites often have a clear public experience that can be separated from the maintenance burden behind it.
Content-led marketing sites, publications, directories, portfolios, and service businesses.
Stores, memberships, learning platforms, marketplaces, and application-like sites.
We map the content, integrations, editing workflow, and recurring problem before choosing a destination.
Illustrative planning categories. The audit confirms what is preserved, replaced, retired, or redesigned.
We preserve what can be preserved, map what must change, and verify the new site before and after launch. No responsible migration can guarantee unchanged rankings.
Use ArwenDigital for discovery, content and URL mapping, implementation, integration work, QA, documentation, or overflow delivery. You remain the client-facing partner; the handoff is explicit and documented.
Explore agency delivery →/about/ → /about/
/old-services/ → /services/
/campaign → reviewtemplate · owner · status
post · editorial · mapped
form · marketing · testedmetadata [pass]
redirects [review]
forms [verify]These specimens show the kind of work the engagement produces. They are not a customer case study or a performance claim.
No. The audit determines suitability. Some sites should stay on WordPress with a focused repair, while others benefit from a simpler WordPress setup or a different modern stack. Astro is one implementation option, not a requirement.
We inventory the content and the people who publish it before choosing an approach. Editors may use a headless CMS, a Git workflow, or a fit-for-purpose interface depending on the content model, team, and review process.
Redirects, metadata, canonicals, internal links, and sitemap behavior are planned and checked. No responsible migration can guarantee unchanged rankings, so we make the risks visible and monitor the launch.
These projects need deeper qualification because commerce, accounts, learning progress, and integrations change the architecture. We can assess them, but they should not be treated as a simple marketing-site migration.
Hosting, monitoring, support, ownership, and handoff are agreed per engagement. We document the operating model so your team knows what happens after launch.
No. An existing design can be preserved, improved selectively, or rebuilt around the same content and conversion goals. The audit helps separate a technical problem from a design problem.
Share the site and the recurring problem. We’ll review the context and reply with the clearest next step.